Archive for April 1st, 2010

Is rancher first casualty of a border war?

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

The murder of rancher Robert Krentz is a family tragedy, the loss of a good, hard-working and generous man.

But it is also crime story, an immigration story, a border security story, a political story, a gun story and, if we’re not careful, a war story.

Krentz was armed when he was killed.

According to Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever, Krentz was murdered by a “sick and sorry” person in a “senseless shooting” with no evidence of a confrontation.

The 58-year-old rancher was on an ATV checking water lines and fencing on his 35,000-acre ranch in southeast Arizona when he came across an unknown individual who later was tracked to the Mexican border. Dever said that Krentz had weapons with him but didn’t use them.

Was he surprised? Ambushed?

Friends describe Krentz as a gentle person who had provided humanitarian assistance to some of the border crossers who trekked across his land. But he also was aware of the dangers of drug smugglers and other criminals. That had to be part of the reason he had weapons with him.

According to one report, Krentz had radioed to his brother that he’d come across an “illegal” in need of help.

A reader called me this week to ask if Krentz could have approached the unknown person on his property with a gun drawn?

The answer is yes.

Read More at AZCentral

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Doesn’t health care violate the Fourteenth Amendment?

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

The McDonald v. Chicago case is a very interesting twist of legal mumbo-jumbo to try to take away your Second Amendment rights. It centers around the idea that the Fourteenth Amendment does not “incorporate” the Second Amendment to the States. Of course we know that the Constitution did that. A study of this subject would necessitate one to review the Fourteenth Amendment.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1

Reading that last clause of this amendment brings up an interesting point. Since the health care legislation does not apply to Congressmen and their staffs and the President, should it apply to me? Is that equal protection of the law?

They have given themselves different tax rates. Is that equal protection of the law?

They are exempt from depending on the Social Security system in their waning years. Is that equal protection of the law?

One might wonder just what equal protection of the law the Fourteenth amendment provides.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Phoenix joins a few smaller communities in taxing food.

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

(Phoenix)—Phoenix joins Williams, Arizona, today, in charging a two-percent tax on food. Only Mesa and Surprise have resisted charging tax on food. The move by the State capitol might ease the way for other cities, such as Flagstaff and Prescott, to charge a sales tax on food to ease their budget woes.

The small town of Williams in Northern Arizona has charged a two-percent sales tax on food to help keep open the small community hospital in the area. They have had to close their community pool, with summer looming, which prompted action by a group of citizens.

This could start a trend by governments across the state who do not seem to realize that they have all ready taxed people, who are facing foreclosures and having to limit their purchases, to the edge.

Proposition 100 is a proposal to “temporarily” increase the state sales tax rate by one-percent to pay for schools, fire and police protection. There is not mention of cutting the fat out of the studies of students to concentrate on reading, math, civics and science only. That is, courses that will help students stay off of welfare roles. Their preference is to teach students that they have “entitlements” from the government.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

And I quote…

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

I’m very proud of my gold pocket watch. My grandfather, on his deathbed, sold me this watch. – Woody Allen Born 1935

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:


Sharing Buttons by Linksku