Archive for May 19th, 2010

Arizona Corporation Commission Exceeds Constitutional Limits

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

PHOENIX – The Arizona Corporation Commission has over-stepped its constitutional boundaries by making rules and regulations in areas our state founders never intended it to control, according to a new report from the Goldwater Institute.

The study, “Rediscovering the ACC’s Roots: Returning to the Original Purpose of the Arizona Corporation Commission,” shows Arizona’s founders deliberately created the Corporation Commission as an agency with limited and defined powers. The Commission was created to protect residents from fraudulent investments and price-gouging by electric and water companies. But instead of keeping utility rates low, the ACC now is forcing utilities to create electricity from certain types of sources which are more expensive, says study author Benjamin Barr, a senior fellow with the Goldwater Institute and CEO of Government Watch.

“The ACC has usurped the Legislature’s role to set energy policy and it will cost consumers $2.4 billion over the next 15 years,” said Nick Dranias, director of constitutional policy at the Goldwater Institute.

The report reviews records from the 1910 Constitutional Convention and finds that delegates specifically rejected attempts to create an agency with sweeping authority over all incorporated businesses. Instead, the constitution was written to limit the power of Corporation Commission so that it only regulated in-state railroads, financial businesses and certain utilities. That power over utilities was further limited to establishing reasonable payment rates for customers.

Mr. Barr recommends that Arizona courts recognize the intended purpose of the Corporation Commission and require the agency to operate within the limits in the state constitution. The Goldwater Institute is challenging in court the Commission’s legal authority to require the use of renewable energy, saying the mandate violates the separation of powers and other constitutional provisions.

Goldwater Institute

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Jan Brewer ad

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Shake President Obama’s hand? ID and proof of citizenship please.

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

According to the Kalamazoo News, President Obama—an opponent of Arizona’s SB 1070—may be getting ready to shake the hand of graduates of Kalamazoo Central High school graduates next month. Provided they have ID and can show proof of citizenship.

According to the article, “Seniors are being asked to provide their birthdates, Social Security numbers and citizen status to the Secret Service so background checks could be performed. Such a check is required for anyone who gets within an arm’s length of the president, students were told at their senior breakfast Friday.”

As for the request for information, Principal Von Washington Jr. told the students, “I’ll let you figure out what that means.”

Kalamazoo News

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

BP oil spill dominates news according to PEW research.

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

A majority of Americans see the massive oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico as a major environmental disaster, but nearly as many voice optimism that efforts to control the spill will succeed.

The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted May 6-9 among 994 adults, finds that the public is critical of the response to the crisis by the federal government and British Petroleum, the company that operated the oil rig that exploded on April 20 and is now struggling to stop the underwater oil release.

Despite the major oil rig leak that continues to spew an estimated 5,000 barrels a day into the Gulf of Mexico, the majority of U.S. voters still support offshore oil drilling.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters shows 64% believe offshore oil drilling should be allowed, up from 58% earlier this month.

Twenty-one percent (21%) say offshore drilling should not be allowed, and another 15% are undecided.

However, most voters (67%) continue to be at least somewhat concerned that offshore drilling will cause environmental problems, including 33% who are Very Concerned. Thirty-two percent (32%) are not concerned about environmental problems caused by offshore drilling, including six percent (6%) who are Not At All Concerned.

PEW Research Center
Rasmussen Reports

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Public Divided Over State, Local Laws Banning Handguns

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

The public is divided over whether state and local governments should be able to pass laws banning the sale and possession of handguns. The Supreme Court is expected to rule in the next few months on the constitutionality of a 28-year-old Chicago law prohibiting handgun ownership in that city.

Half of the public (50%) says that state and local governments should not be able to pass laws barring the sale or possession of handguns in their jurisdictions, while 45% say they should be able to pass such laws.

Previous Pew Research surveys have found broad opposition to a law banning the sale of handguns. In April 2008, 59% said they opposed a law banning handguns while 36% favored such a law. There was less opposition to a law banning handgun sales in 2000 and the late 1990s. In March 2000, 47% opposed a law banning handgun sales while the same percentage favored it.

PEW Research Poll

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

“Socialism” Not So Negative, “Capitalism” Not So Positive

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

“Socialism” is a negative for most Americans, but certainly not all Americans. “Capitalism” is regarded positively by a majority of the public, though it is a thin majority. There are certain segments of the public – notably, young people and Democrats – where both “isms” are rated about equally. And while most Americans have a negative reaction to the word “militia,” the term is viewed more positively by Republican men than most other groups.

These are among the findings of a national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press that tests reactions to words and phrases frequently used in current political discourse. Overall, 29% say they have a positive reaction to the word “socialism,” while 59% react negatively. The public’s impressions of “capitalism,” though far more positive, are somewhat mixed. Slightly more than half (52%) react positively to the word “capitalism,” compared with 37% who say they have a negative reaction.

PEW Research Poll

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Arizona Official Threatens to Cut Off Los Angeles Power as Payback for Boycott

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

If Los Angeles wants to boycott Arizona, it had better get used to reading by candlelight.

That’s the message from a member of Arizona’s top government utilities agency, who threw down the gauntlet Tuesday in a letter to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa by threatening to cut off the city’s power supply as retribution.

Gary Pierce, a commissioner on the five-member Arizona Corporation Commission, wrote the letter in response to the Los Angeles City Council’s decision last week to boycott the Grand Canyon State—in protest of its immigration law—by suspending official travel there and ending future contracts with state businesses.
Continue reading “Arizona Official Threatens to Cut Off Los Angeles Power as Payback for Boycott” »

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Arizona votes to axe 14,000 jobs.

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

About two-thirds of the voters in Arizona voted for the 18-percent increase in sales taxes which will cost an estimated 14,000 jobs in Arizona to save a few thousand government jobs.

The Arizona legislature voted to pass-the-buck to the voters for budget cuts that they should be making. $2.6 million dollars was raised for ads evoking images of Why Johnny can’t read, the lone cop on the beat who continually tracks down all of the criminals that we had to release from prison so he couldn’t get there to stop you being raped, beaten and robbed while your house burned down for lack of fire protection.

The ads did not show the kids running barefoot because their parents lost the minimum-wage job they had. Not to worry. A healthy-budgeted CPS will be glad to drag them kicking and screaming from your house because you can’t take care of them. The ads did not calculate the loss of “revenue” from 14,000 jobs cuts.

The terror-based ads were enough to convince 693,281 (of the nearly 99% votes counted) to approve the measure. We do not know what percentage of that vote is government workers scrambling for what ever jobs might be saved from budget cuts.

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Who’s right on jobs and Proposition 100?

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010


Goldwater Institute Daily Email
April 22, 2010

Proposition 100 supporters are touting estimates from economists at the University of Arizona and Arizona State University. They claim an 18 percent increase in the state’s sales tax would cost fewer jobs than the number of jobs that otherwise may be lost due to reductions in the government spending.

Let’s think about this. If the state economists are right, it means the more we tax and let government spend, the more jobs we’ll have. Well, let me get on that bandwagon! Let’s not stop at an 18 percent tax hike; let’s double the tax rate and government spending along with it. We’d get a whole lot more economic growth.

The absurdity of this tortured economic reasoning, based on a popular Depression-era theory, can be illustrated by looking at a photo of earth taken at night. If the state economists were right, North Korea would be more than a big, dark blot. North Korea and Cuba would outshine the world with their prosperity.

Last year the Goldwater Institute asked the independent Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University to estimate the economic impact if the state raised the sales tax. They found the state will lose 14,000 private sector jobs.

Goldwater Institute

State finances will be in worse shape in 2014 if the proposed 18 percent increase in the state sales tax passes on May 18, according to long-term projections by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. With Proposition 100’s passage, the deficit in 2014 would be almost $1 billion. Without Prop. 100’s tax increase, the projected 2014 deficit would be $200 million.

These new estimates highlight the fact that Prop. 100 fails to address the state’s long-term structural deficit brought on by too much spending. Past spending and new programs were not adequately funded when they were signed into law. But the damage this caused to the state’s financial stability wasn’t clear for a few years because tax revenues spiked during the real estate bubble. JLBC’s deficit projections assume the state maintains current eligibility requirements for taxpayer-funded health care, which is likely given the new mandates passed under the federal health care bill.

And the budget deficits go on: Prop. 100 would fix nothing

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Rand Paul’s Victory Set To Boost Tea Party’s Confidence

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Rand Paul, who has started his political career this year and enjoys a good support among Tea Party activists, captured the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate in Kentucky yesterday.

Secretary of State Trey Grayson was Paul’s nearest competitor and he conceded defeat as polls showed Paul cruising to a sizable victory. “We must unite behind Dr. Paul. We have more things that unite us,” Grayson told supporters in Hebron, Kentucky.

USA New Week

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:

Running down the other big GOP primaries

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

- Rep. John Boozman (R-Ark.) handily won the GOP nomination to challenge whoever wins the Democrats’ primary for U.S. Senate, giving the party the candidate it wanted.

- In Arkansas’s 1st District, restaurant owner Rick Crawford rolled past Princella Smith, an African American Hill staffer who’d racked up support from establishment conservatives and appeared in multiple stories about the crop of 2010 black Republican candidates. Crawford won 72.8 percent of the vote to 27.2 percent for Smith.

- In Oregon’s 5th District, State Rep. Scott Bruun won the GOP nomination to challenge Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) — Bruun’s second attempt at winning this seat after coming short 14 years ago.

Right Now
Inside the Conservative movement and the Republican Party with David Weigel
Washington Post

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share

Possibly related articles:


Sharing Buttons by Linksku