Despair is typical of those who do not understand the causes of evil, see no way out, and are incapable of struggle.—Vladimir Lenin
The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.—Vladimir Lenin
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.—Vladimir Lenin
Terrorists have succeeded in another terrorist plot against the United States. Bombs have been unleashed in the homes of Americans across the country, yet no buildings have fallen. It is the type of terror used across this nation since the Wilson administration. Some physical “black ops,” but mostly a type of terrorism not reported by the State-approved media. It is not reported because they are the perpetrator. The terror is psychological. It is spawned by CNN, MSNBC, CBS ABC and, yes, the Fox News Network.
This terror was used by Democrats against Republican complaining that Republican wanted to end Social Security. Of course, a Constitutional Republican (sometimes mistakenly referred to as a Libertarian) would want to end Social Security. That type of phrase is exactly the type that the Democrats use to prove their point. Of course, they lie by omission.
The argument goes something like this. The Republicans want to end Social Security in favor of private investments. Look at the recent “housing bubble” and auto industry crisis. What would happen if people invested all of their money in those industries. What then?
The omissions: The “free” education that is in place by the Department of Education, run by the National Teachers’ Association union1 has taught that economics, which used to be taught in schools2, are too complex for our pretty little heads to worry over.
2nd, the taxes wrested from the hands of unsuspecting citizens for a specific purpose (that in itself is unconstitutional) were unconstitutionally diverted to the opulence of the Washington Empire.
3rd, that the Social, so-called, Security is virtually defunct and running on IOUs.
4th, the so-called collapse was instigated by, and controlled by, the Federal Reserve and cheerleaded by Congress who pressured Fannie Mae and others to get into risky derivatives and other high risk investments. It is the same terrorists method that the “National Bank” used against Andrew Jackson when he vetoed their charter and against Jimmy Carter when he fired Alan Greenspan.
5thTo end the current system does not remove the obligation that the federal government has to pay those who paid in to the system. They simply have to stop stealing the money and start putting it back in.
The program is false, but the terror is real. The Republicans will take away the pittance that we “trickle-down” to you.
The TRUTH was that the Republicans wanted YOU to have a choice to use the system broken by Democrats, use your own retirement system or a combination of the two. The FACT is that THE REPUBLICAN plan was just as unconstitutional because it REQUIRED that you have some sort of private plan to opt out of the government plan.
I want to remind you of what occurred during the “health care” debate3 when Tea Party members were “terrorists” and anyone who did not believe in Socialist programs were racists. Never mind the example of Social Security, let alone Medicare.4 Union workers had free reign to beat up protesters and Jimmy Carter joined the chorus to equate opposition to health care communism to using the “N” word. At least Obama sent a real man to tell Arizona they were going to be sued. Obama let everyone run for about two months before he announced, Aw shucks. We don’t think they’s prejudice. We ne’er said so! He is correct. The White House never issued a statement saying that. He just let the damage, and the union beatings, continue.
Now we turn to the matter of SB-1070. Based on false precepts, La Raza—and like organizations wanting to “kill Arizona cops” and “axe American citizens” which seems okay with Janet Napolitano—are using the new terror key word “profiling.” It will encourage profiling. Never mind the profiling of the Department of Homeland Security. Federal government profiling is, uhm-uhm, GOOD profiling.
And CNN, and their colleagues, are spreading the news throughout the land through every air wave that they have under their control (coming to a radio near you soon!). What! They never said it would encourage racial profiling. No, they didn’t have to. They simply got people on air that would say it. They packed the air waves with “peaceful” protesters void of toppling cars, “kill cops” signs and the slogan kill Americans with axes.
How much terror has this caused? I’ll explain. A dear elderly friend of mine called me the other day with SB-1070 clearly more than thirty-days from going into effect and said that she was profiled. I will only reveal the gist of the conversation and not reveal her name or that of the organization involved. I plead the CNN rule. I explained that the new law had not even taken effect. What profiling occurred?
Incidentally, only the federal government may profile in Arizona as it is currently against the law for us yokels who don’t know how to do it right. We have had to release known criminals because of this plea of profiling. I mention this only to point out that—had profiling occurred—I would have helped her find all of the necessary material for a lawsuit.
As you recall, I informed her that the law had not taken effect and that it has safeguards built in against profiling. How had she been profiled? As it turns out, she called a private organization for assistance on the telephone. Everything was going fine until she gave her name. The person then informed her that she would have to come in with a birth certificate and show proof of citizenship.
While my heart goes out to her, this had noting to do with SB-1070 and everything to do with the terrorist activity sweeping our nation. Private non-governmental agencies can, and do, have regulations and certain requirements for their assistance. Some may require you to be a citizen. I, for example, could expect no assistance from La Raza, the Rainbow Coalition, the Anti-defamation league or Michael Moore.
So, let’s examine this SB-1070. That is, the law as it is set to be enforced on July 29. Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano may follow along here. The words in green are changes made by the Arizona House.
FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT STOP, DETENTION OR ARREST MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OF A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OTHER LAW OR ORDINANCE OF A COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN OR THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO AND IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON, EXCEPT IF THE DETERMINATION MAY HINDER OR OBSTRUCT AN INVESTIGATION. … A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT SOLELY CONSIDER RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN IMPLEMENTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES OR ARIZONA CONSTITUTION
And…
D. A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY NOT CONSIDER RACE, COLOR OR NATIONAL ORIGIN IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SECTION EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES OR ARIZONA CONSTITUTION.
E. IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SECTION, AN ALIEN’S IMMIGRATION STATUS MAY BE DETERMINED BY:
1. A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO IS AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO VERIFY OR ASCERTAIN AN ALIEN’S IMMIGRATION STATUS.
2. THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OR THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
The first significant change is the removal of the word CONTACT. Why is that significant? That means that if an illegal reports a crime, the officer CANNOT ask his immigration status or add it to any report.
If an elderly lady falls over and requires transportation to a hospital, an officer cannot ask her immigration status. Although Arizona did pass an initiative that hospitals had to ensure citizenship—just like in Mexico, to provide treatment which has not been enforced. Terry Goddard saw to that. Obama and Napolitano has promised not to assist in enforcing the law against their oath to the Constitution.
All of the other gobbledygook simply means that if they stop you for a traffic stop or arrest you for smuggling drugs across the border or catch you kidnapping a nine-year old girl, they can check your immigration status IF there is a reasonable question. In you notice, it does not say “Mexicans.” It says the immigration status of the person. That could be anyone of Arabic origin or who speaks with an Irish or Australian accent.
Section 23-212.01.E prevents “Entrapment” by law enforcement. Most of the “penalties” have been removed so the bill has “false teeth.” Section 13-2929 still makes it illegal to transport illegals or encourage illegal immigration. Section 13-1509 makes it illegal for “green card” holders not to register and re-register or to refuse to carry their proper identification.
Speaking of identification, what is proper identification? If you have a drivers license (presumably even one from California), you have proper identification. If you don’t drive, you can obtain a State identification card. Unless those identifications prove to be falsified, there is no problem. Seems odd that the Department of Homeland Security which demands “Real-ID” would object to that.
The bottom line is that the law that will go into effect is so radically different than that which was proposed as to be almost useless. In fact, it pretty much gives them the same power to make arrests for federal crimes that was given through Gonzales v. City of Peoria, 722 F.2nd 468, 474 (9th Cir. 1983).
But the terror has been effective. Napolitano fighting for her job says that she will prevent the Border Patrol from doing their job and reigns in the Hispanic vote. Obama fighting to keep health care and other communist programs entrenched in the system sues Arizona and sends 1200 unarmed troops to the border who are not there to stop illegals. Ann Kirkpatrick perpetuates the myth so that she can get the vote. Never mind that she voted for health care so either does not understand the Constitution or “…doesn’t care about it in cases like this.”
Don’t buy into the terror any longer. Read your RIGHTS. Read the CONSTITUTION. Do just a little study of your history. The problem is how can we be impressed with any of the candidates that Arizona is offering for federal office?
1 It must be understood that “unions” are NOT an American concept by Constitutional design or tradition. They ARE a concept right out of the Manifesto of the Communist Party. They are designed to consolidate power in the hands of a few to exercise power over the masses. You can charge me with McCarthism, should you so desire. It only tells me that you are a product of public school who has not studied, hopes to be able to “Kill police in Arizona until we get free” or otherwise hope to derive benefits without having to work (for which you are in for a sore disappointment), or are one of those around the world attacking the United States from without and within because of your petty jealousies concerning our American culture of freedom of liberty.
2 SEE: The Government Class Book
3 Of course, there was no debate. The science was settled. Republicans and Democrats agreed we need health care.
4 It might be pointed out that the word “Security” is used in a “Social” context only once in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. And it has nothing to do with defrauding the tax payer.
Possibly related articles:
Tags: Arizona, Constitution, OpEd, Opinion, SB 1070, Tea Party, Terror, Terrorists
Loading ...
