Retired Raytheon Engineer Don Woolley is planning to start the Southern Arizona Conservative PAC in Sahuarita, Arizona. Mr. Woolley has been working on getting the paper work completed with the Secretary of State and has a Facebook page.
In an email exchange, Mr. Woolley explained that their concerns are mainly with southern Arizona, but may promote candidates and government legislation on a case-by-case basis. The PAC is open to people who consider themselves conservative despite their political party. He is asking for donations to get the PAC started.
In an email to one of his possible volunteers, he writes, “We will assemble a board from a wide range of folks, not more than 6, with a treasurer and deputy treasurer, and we encourage you to send us candidate’s info so we can survey them individually, of course the first requirement is they have to be conservatives.
“The qualifications are you have to be a conservative, smaller government, lower taxes, more liberty, balanced budget at all levels of government.”
“We are playing the roll out at the end of the week, I will send you an email with Website and Facebook URLs…we have laid the ground work and are anxious to start taking donations, we will be working through Paypal so rest assured everyone’s security will be protected,” he added.
Currently, you can contact the PAC at southernarizonaconservativepac@gmail.com or phone 520-256-5333. Their web site is expected to be online soon.
Candidate for Congress Roger Williams held an open debate with Democrats, recently, which was not aired on PBS. As I understand it, Democrats do not want it to air in his home State of Texas. While Mr. Williams seems to be trying to bring up campaign issues, you will notice the Democrats all respond with the same answer. The Democratic responses make about as much sense as they normally do.
Democracy Costs. Republican form of government free. More woes for Quartzsite.
Not only do you have to pay big bucks to city governments, you gotta pay big bucks to be in city government. If you are unpopular, anyway. Apparently, DEMOCRACY in Arizona means the one with the biggest bucks, not the will of the people. At least in a Republican form of government, when you get elected, you get to take office. The Republican form of government is the one guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America, by the way.
This morning, something happened in the La Paz County Superior Court that few expected. Mayor Elect
Jose’ Lizarraga was determined to be “unqualified” if he failed to obtain and file a bond prior to taking office, as required by Quartzsite Town Code.This was only one of several allegations made against him by third place mayoral candidate Jennifer Jones, who contested Lizarraga’s eligibility for office.
Lizarraga had not filed the required response to the contest of the August 30th mayoral election, and did not show up to court today. Contestant Jones motioned for a default judgment, but Judge Michael Burke stated the law allowed for the hearing to proceed “ex parte”.
Last week’s NPR interview on “Tell Me More” really should be called “Tell Me Less”. Their heavy editing of only The Radiance Foundation’s perspective, while preserving every word spoken by Reverend Carlton Veazey,revealed NPR’s typical liberal bias and uninformed defense of Planned Parenthood. The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice CEO’s closing remarks (nearly two minutes versus mine which were cut down to 15 seconds) were just a continuation of pro-abortion histrionics by the historically challenged.
Veazey was unwilling to address the epidemic of abortion in the black community, even denying Planned Parenthood’s entire history rooted in the racist pseudoscience of eugenics. He played the role so clearly defined by Margaret Sanger’s original Negro Project back in 1939, using black pastors to propagandize on her behalf. Margaret Higgins Sanger Slee was a grand manipulator and strategist, with a veritable war chest from her second husband, Noah Slee, an oil tycoon.
Many of her aggressive and repulsive eugenics-based efforts were funded by organizations sympathetic with her Birth Control crusade. One of those population control entities was the Ford Foundation, which also funds the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC) and pro-abortion activist groups like SisterSong, both staunch defenders of Planned Parenthood. Money was never an obstacle for Sanger and her fellow eugenicists. However, ideological resistance, rooted in Christian faith, was.
The Separation of Church and State poster child—Thomas Jefferson—is quoted as saying, “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
The Republican-controlled house has created a list of budget cuts. The White House contends these cuts represent cuts in services that will destroy the lives of every American (paraphrased). It is much better to leave the People destitute and penniless in return for these important services. Continue reading “Budget cuts objectionable to the White House” »
This article just shows the corruption of “organized labor” which has no valid reason to even exist according to the Constitution and American tradition. Why would corrupt union officers and the government object to a secret ballot except to control those forced into unions, in many cases.
The other point to remember is that this was an amendment to the Constitution of Arizona voted on by the people by referendum. California voted on Proposition 8 to make marriage be between a man and a woman, as God intended. There were lawsuits over that. What happened to all of this great Demonocracy?
It is the union that called for heavier fines in the Obama health care debacle knowing that they (and the members of Congress, their staffs and families) are exempt from it.
The thing I don’t understand is why regular citizens in Arizona do not protest the fact that their ballot is not secret. Ask your County Clerk. They will brag about how they can find out how you voted for up to six months.
Arizona voters approved an amendment to the state constitution in 2010 to expand protection for a worker’s right to vote by secret ballot if asked to join a union. On May 6, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board sued the State of Arizona in federal court to prevent enforcement of the constitutional amendment, claiming federal law pre-empts any protection to workers that the state might offer. The Goldwater Institute has joined the State in opposing the lawsuit on behalf of individual workers to protect the Save Our Secret Ballot amendment and safeguard an individual’s right to decide whether or not to join a labor organization. Continue reading “National Labor Relations Board v. State of Arizona (Save Our Secret Ballot case)” »
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is vowing to block President Obama’s nominations until he gets detailed answers on a controversial program that resulted in drug cartels acquiring more than 1,300 firearms from the U.S.
Grassley is pressing the Department of Justice (DOJ) on who initiated the “Gun Runner” program that authorized the sale of guns to people acting as straw purchasers for drug cartels in Mexico. Gun Runner might have contributed to the death of at least one federal agent.
But if, on the other hand, this form of government contains principles that will lead to the subversion of liberty — if it tends to establish a despotism, or, what is worse, a tyrannic aristocracy; then, if you adopt it, this only remaining assylum for liberty will be shut up, and posterity will execrate your memory.—Brutus, Anti-Federalist paper
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez of Kawliforna knows how to get along with people. Mock TEA party candidates with a southern accent.
Of course, we know a Southern accent is Hollywood code for a hick, McCarthyist.
She know three things about the Constitution—that she read from a cue card—but apparently hasn’t read the rest. She complains that getting things done with people who know the Constitution is difficult.
That is the way it is supposed to be. Just because you violated the Constitution in the past, except the three things you happen to know about, doesn’t mean that the Government—that is the We the People part of the Constitution that you might have missed—are going to let you continue.
Stephanie Miller, radio talk show host, is heard saying at the end of clip, “Yeah, this is a new breed. This really is.”
A new breed? There were about 40 guys a little over 220-years ago that thought the Constitution was a pretty good idea. In fact, the “TEA Party” movement was named after an action some of them took one Christmas season.
Oh, you might not have heard about it. You’re from Kawliforna.
Now the Constitution did have its detractors. They were known as the Anti-Federalists. Just about everything that they complained about the Constitution has been fulfilled in the Platform of the Democratic Party.
While researching for my latest book, I found an interesting view on this “progressive” movement. This view comes from a small book of two essays entitled “Experiments in Government and the Essentials of the Constitution” by Elihu Root. It was written in 1913 when the “progressive” movement was starting with full force.
I was pointed to an article by—FreedomTorch.com founder Jonathan Cousar—that was on the Communist Party of the USA web site admitting that Joseph McCarthy(1) slowed them down.
We know, of course, that one of the loudest “progressive” voices of this era was from Republican Theodore Roosevelt. I found it curious that Mr. Root and President Roosevelt interacted throughout their political careers and apparently got along quite famously. Yet they held such divergent views of the Constitution.
SO WHO IS THIS ROOT GUY?
The very question I had when I found his book snuggled in the text files of my computer.
The Nobel Prize organization said he, “…became one of the most brilliant administrators in American history,…”(2) Why would they say that about him? Because he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1912 while serving in the United States Senate. He did not receive the award, however, under some pretense that—somehow—destroying the American economy with carbon taxes would—somehow—make the earth a more peaceful place. He got his Nobel Prize the old-fashioned way. He earned it.
Root served as Secretary of War from 1899 to 1904 under Presidents McKinley and progressive Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt served as Assistant Secretary of the Navy under Elihu Root. Mr. Root returned to private practice in 1904, but was called upon by Roosevelt in 1905 to assue the duties of the 38th Secretary of State.
He served in that role until 1909 when he became a Senator until 1915. He declined another term as Senator and even declined the offer of the Republican party nomination as President.
STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — Many Russian immigrants to the “red borough” of Staten Island are flocking to the Republican Party, saying that the national Democrats’ “socialistic” policies remind them too much of the top-down oligarchy they fled in their native land.
With many of the borough’s Russian arrivees already owning businesses and active in civic organizations, their muscle could help the Island GOP solidify electoral gains made this year, when the party took back congressional and Assembly seats.
Businessman Arkadiy Fridman said that the newly formed Citizens Magazine Business Club, a confederation of more than 50 Russian-owned businesses here and in Brooklyn, has aligned itself with the Molinari Republican Club (MRC) in an effort to increase the Russian community’s political and economic clout.
UPDATE: Gabrielle Giffords did survive the shooting, but a nine year-old boy was among the six people killed. Channel 3 news is reporting that 12 people in total were shot. Doctors say that Giffords has a good chance of recovery.
Federal Judge John Rolle is reported among those killed.
“An attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serve,” said House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in a statement. “Acts and threats of violence against public officials have no place in our society….This is a sad day for our country.”
Senator John McCain said, “I am horrified by the violent attack on Representative Gabrielle Giffords and many other innocent people by a wicked person who has no sense of justice or compassion. I pray for Gabby and the other victims, and for the repose of the souls of the dead and comfort for their families. I beg our loving Creator to spare the lives of those who are still alive, heal them in body and spirit, and return them to their loved ones.
“Whoever did this; whatever their reason, they are a disgrace to Arizona, this country and the human race, and they deserve and will receive the contempt of all decent people and the strongest punishment of the law.”
The shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, apparently has a history on the Internet.
Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head at close range by a gunman Saturday morning outside a grocery store in Tucson while holding a public event, Fox News has confirmed.
Eight others were shot, including three of the Arizona Democrat’s aides, at Giffords’ “Your Corner” event held at a Safeway grocery story. A suspect is in custody.
The three staffers who were shot worked out of Giffords’ Arizona office.
WASHINGTON (AP) – Rep. Charles Rangel has established a defense fund that will allow supporters to contribute up to $5,000 a year to help pay his legal bills.
The New York Democrat still owes money to his former lawyers, who represented him in an ethics case that ended with his censure.
The Charles B. Rangel Legal Expense Trust was approved by the House ethics committee, the same panel that successfully recommended that the House censure Rangel for financial and fundraising misconduct. Rangel announced the establishment of the fund on Tuesday.
H. Carl McCall, the former New York State comptroller, will serve as trustee. Contributions will be reported quarterly and disclosed publicly.
The House voted 333-79 on Dec. 2 to censure Rangel, a punishment that required the speaker of the House to publicly read the censure resolution while the 80-year-old lawmaker stood at the front of the chamber.
* American President left off the guest list as it is not a ‘state occasion’
* Royal couple eager to ask ordinary citizens to attend rather than VIPs
* Heads of State who may attend include Nicolas Sarkozy and wife Carla Bruni
MailOnline
Nancy Reagan attended the wedding of Prince Charles and Diana in her husband’s absence in 1981 and also received an invite to Prince Andrew’s 1986 wedding to Sarah Ferguson – despite that not being a state occasion
President Obama and his wife Michelle will not be invited to Prince William’s wedding next year.
Because Prince William is not yet heir to the throne, his wedding to Kate Middleton is not classed as a ‘state occasion’ – and the couple feel under no pressure to fill the 2,000-strong guest list with heads of state, the Mail understands.
They are more eager to ask ordinary citizens and charity workers than foreign dignitaries and VIPs to what will be the first royal ‘people’s wedding’, courtiers suggested.
A handful of heads of state are likely to be invited in line with previous royal weddings, possibly including France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife Carla Bruni.
February 5, 2012 1906 John Carradine 1920 Frank Muir CBE 1946 Charlotte Rampling 1948 Barbara Hershey 1948 Lord Haden Guest 1948 Sven-Goran Eriksson 1952 Russell Grant 1962 Jennifer Jason Leigh 1966 Jose Maria Olazabal
Have a question concerning the Constitution and your rights? You can try our U.S. Succinct Court Office.. WE ARE NOT LAWYERS and we CANNOT GIVE ADVISE on any case that may be pending for or against you. We can, however, provide links to resources that might answer your questions. Feel free to use our Contact Form.
The Constitutional Republic Party web site is NOT a non-profit organization for tax purposes. We do not provide candidates for office, but we support candidates with Constitutional views. Our current purpose is to provide education about the true purpose of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and other historic documents. We do provide information and news which may have an impact on your Constitutional rights.
We will publish almost any, intelligent articles and opinions that do not contain cursing and do not advocate physical violence against an individual or group of individuals---even if they are belligerent. Those opinions expressed and comments in reply to such opinions are solely those of the authors.
Loading ...
